Table of Contents
Justin Baldoni And Blake LivelyThe lawyers are shooting each other back because of the Lively motion to reject themselves from the lawsuit of millions of dollars It ends with us Director has submitted against her.
Bryan Freedman The movement described as “disgusting” and described it as “abuse of the system” through a statement issued to US Weekly On Thursday, March 20.
“The recent motion of Mrs. Lively to dismiss herself from the self -bound disaster she initiated is one of the most disgusting examples of abusing our legal system,” he said through the statement. “Strict rules are introduced to protect the innocent and to allow individuals to rightly defend themselves. Laws are not intended to be twisted and compiled by privileged elites to fit their own personal agenda.”
He continued: “As we said yesterday in response to Mr. Reynolds’s same cowardly measures, we will continue to hold Mrs. Lively for her actions of pure malice, including false accusations of intimidation and retribution. Her fantastic claims will be quickly disproved as discovery movements, easily conquered that it is actual proof.”
A spokesperson for Lively hit the statement against then Us reached for comments.
“The late nightfale of answers – instead of movements to dismiss – reveal that [Baldoni and Wayfarer defendants] Know that they have no legal arguments remotely able to reject our complaint, “said the spokesperson for Lively Us On Friday, March 21. “Instead, they accepted that Mrs. Lively’s complaint is the valid legal claims that they could collect no reason to reject. In the meantime, every person and entity that has sued the Baldoni-Wayfarer team has been rejecting his deserving PR stunt.”
Earlier on Thursday, Lively, 37, submitted the motion to reject the lawsuit, according to documents seen by Us.
“This lawsuit is an in -depth abuse of the legal process that has no place in the federal court. The legislation in California now explicitly prohibits the suggestion of victims who take the decision to speak out against sexual harassment or retribution, either in a lawsuit or in the press,” Lival’s lawyers Mike Gottlieb And Esra Hudson told Us In a statement.
De verklaring vervolgde: “Deze Meritless en Retaliatory-rechtszaak loopt eerst het hoofd in drie wettelijke obstakels, waaronder de rechtszaak, een eerlijke rapport en privileges voor seksuele intimidatie, waarvan de laatste een verplichte vergoeding bevat die verschuivende voorziening die nodig is voor … Wayfarer Studios, en anderen die frivole defamatie-claims tegen mevrouw Lively To Modes. Mevrouw Lively ‘in Oblivion ‘suggests only more liability for them, and rightly, seen what they have done. “

A spokesperson for Lively also said Us, “The painful reality is that Mrs. Lively is not alone to be charged because of defamation after speaking about sexually harassment at work. That is complete why California recently performed AB 933, the privileged communication incident of sexual abuse, intimidation, or discrimination law, which is the Civile Civile Civile Civil Code. It is important to speak for other people, it is important to know that they have scientific claims, to know that they have a different legal law that explicitly protects them from silence or financially ruined by a defamation. “
Baldoni, 41, and vibrant are involved in controversy since they were costed in the film adjustment of Colleen Hoover’s best selling novel, It ends with us.
After the rumors spread that Baldoni and Lively could argue in August 2024 during the promotion of the film, the couple confirmed that there was hostility when lawsuits were launched months later.
In December 2024, Lively Baldoni accused sexual harassment and launches a smear campaign against her (Baldoni denies the accusations.)
For his part Baldoni visited a $ 400 million lawsuit against Lively, her husband, Ryan ReynoldsAnd her publicist in January, including charges, including claims. The couple denied the accusations. Reynolds has submitted to reject the lawsuit in judicial documents obtained by Us on Tuesday, March 18.