Diddy’s defense says that ‘freak offs’ were consensual, persecution must prove forced vent

The Clearly The test will spend a lot of time on his “freak off” parties, and the problem here is permission … His defense says that the encounters were consensual, and the prosecution must prove differently.

TMZ is investigating the legal strategy around the Freak Offs in our new documentary, “The Downfall of Diddy: His Defense”, now available on Tubi.

Criminal lawyers who have won some of the most controversial criminal cases in America break down how permission will play a major role in Diddy’s process.

Prosecutors must prove that Diddy has used coercion in those freak off parties if they get a conviction – but listen to Joe Tacopina” Mark Geragos And Jose Baez Explain why Diddy’s defense will be convinced that they can prove that these were consensual encounters.

The Diddy team describes all alleged victims as former girlfriends … and as these criminal lawyers point to it, it is not an easy task for the FBI to convince a jury these women became sex trade.

We even had a fake jury for our documentary, that deliberated and fiercely debated coercion and permission … before you vote or Diddy is guilty or not.