– OPINION –
The deadly Listeria outbreak in Boar’s Head is a reminder that the food safety problems that Upton Sinclair exposed in “The Jungle” more than a century ago still persist. The impact of Sinclair’s work, which exposed the hidden dangers of food production, resonates today as modern food safety failures, such as those at Boar’s Head, expose persistent systemic weaknesses.
In 1906, Sinclair’s novel shocked the public with vivid descriptions of unsanitary conditions in the meatpacking industry. The revelation of contaminated and mishandled meat led directly to the passage of the Pure Food and Drug Act of 1906 and the Meat Inspection Act of 1906. Although Sinclair’s focus was on the exploitation of workers, it was the food safety scandal that captured national attention and initiated major reforms.
A 1906 review of “The Jungle” by The London Times Literary Supplement reflects the global reaction to Sinclair’s revelations. Despite the novel being fiction, the descriptions were so disgusting that the reviewer wondered whether such content should even be made accessible to the public. What was more disturbing to the reviewer was the authenticity behind Sinclair’s story. The conclusion was clear: Sinclair’s story was based on reality, a fact that was confirmed when President Roosevelt took action to address the scandal.
The words of the British reviewer echo through time: “The things Mr. Sinclair describes happened yesterday, are happening today, and will happen tomorrow and the next day, until some Hercules comes to clean the filthy stable.”
Despite decades of progress in food safety regulations, incidents such as this ongoing outbreak of Boar’s Head Listeria show that the underlying problems persist. This outbreak is not just a glitch in one company’s operations; it is a sign that the regulatory and inspection systems designed to prevent such failures may still fall short.
Boar’s Head, a well-known and trusted brand founded a year before Sinclair’s 1906 novel, was expected to meet the highest food safety standards. Yet this outbreak has damaged public trust, illustrating that even the most reputable companies are not immune to food safety lapses. The erosion of consumer confidence when incumbents fail to maintain basic sanitation is significant. It challenges the belief that we have gone far beyond the dangers Sinclair exposed more than a century ago.
A major difference between 1906 and today is the speed and power of the spread of information. When Sinclair published “The Jungle,” the shocking details took time to penetrate the public consciousness and spur government action. Today, news of food safety deficiencies spreads instantly, creating pressure for immediate action and accountability. Social media, news media and consumer advocacy groups are rapidly exacerbating food safety concerns, forcing companies to respond in real time.
Another striking difference, however, is that Boar’s Head had more than 120 years to learn from the past. With access to advanced technology, strict safety protocols and extensive regulations, companies like Boar’s Head are equipped to prevent such mistakes. What is often missing is the commitment and courage to consistently prioritize consumer health. The recent outbreak of Listeria reflects not only a technical or procedural failure, but also a failure of leadership and willpower – a missed opportunity to apply the lessons learned since Sinclair’s presentation.
Boar’s Head released a statement on September 13 that contains the exact same pages from the corporate crisis response playbook that I have shared many times.
After major food safety failures, companies always have a spokesperson or statements that point out the same three things:
1) the kind of sentiment ‘food safety has always been our top priority/commitment’,
2) the “we are going to make new people responsible for food safety” type promise, and
3) the type of statement “we are going to review our training/protocols”.
Boar’s Head’s statement came as no surprise.
“…the company is implementing a number of enhanced food safety and quality measures, including the appointment of a new Chief Food Safety and Quality Assurance Officer (CFSO) and the establishment of a new Boar’s Head Food Safety Council.”
You might think this is a little too late for a company that is almost 120 years old. However, their statement also mentioned next steps to create a “new standard for food safety in the industry.” While this sounds promising, the rest of the industry will view this outbreak as a reminder that companies cannot afford to rely solely on regulations, market share or past performance to maintain food safety. Courage and proactive responsibility are needed to uphold the integrity of our food systems – a lesson that has been clear for more than a century, but in this case is tragically ignored.
The reference to Hercules in the London Times Literary Supplement review is appropriate. Indeed, a huge effort is needed to cleanse “the filthy stable” of food safety challenges. But who will rise as this modern Hercules? It is not a job for one company or individual; it is a collective responsibility. Regulators, industry leaders, food safety professionals and consumers must work together to create and maintain the necessary vigilance.
The Boar’s Head outbreak shows that even with strict regulations, food safety is not guaranteed. Complying with the rules is just the basics. True food safety requires companies to go beyond compliance by implementing strict internal standards, continuous monitoring and a culture of proactive problem solving.
It’s easy to point the finger at Boar’s Head, but the more constructive path forward is to use this incident as a learning opportunity. In 1906, public outrage sparked by ‘The Jungle’ led to a radical overhaul of food safety laws. Today we have the opportunity to not only respond, but also be proactive. Food companies should view this outbreak as a reminder that food safety is an ongoing obligation. It’s not something that can be set on autopilot; it requires constant attention, training and investment.
Boar’s Head’s failure is a wake-up call for the entire food industry. It reminds us that history can repeat itself if the lessons of the past are ignored. Just as Sinclair’s work exposed the harsh realities of food production, contemporary mistakes reveal the gaps that remain to be addressed.
The path to true food safety requires more than just technological advancements or regulatory compliance. It takes courage – courage from companies to enforce high standards, from regulators to hold violators accountable, and from consumers to demand transparency. Without this collective courage, the same problems Sinclair highlighted will continue to plague our food system, putting lives at risk.
Ultimately, “The Jungle” wasn’t just a critique of one industry’s failures; it was a call for a massive effort to protect public health. Today, more than 100 years later, that call remains relevant. Let this Boar’s Head outbreak be a turning point where the industry chooses to fully embrace its responsibility. Only by promoting a true culture of safety and transparency can we finally answer Sinclair’s challenge and cleanse the ‘stable’ of our food systems, ensuring safer food for all.
(To sign up for a free subscription to Food Safety News,click here)