Home Finance Why traditional retirement accounts have become the worst asset for estate planning

Why traditional retirement accounts have become the worst asset for estate planning

by trpliquidation
0 comment
Why traditional retirement accounts have become the worst asset for estate planning

Listen and subscribe to Decoding Retirement at Apple podcasts, Spotifyor wherever you find your favorite podcasts.

Those saving for retirement have long viewed traditional individual retirement accounts (IRAs) as the ultimate savings tool, offering pre-tax savings, tax-free growth and a sweetheart deal for the beneficiaries of inherited IRAs.

However, people need to stop thinking this is the case, according to Ed Slott, author of “The Retirement Savings Time Bomb Ticks Louder.”

Recent changes in the law have stripped IRAs of all their redeeming qualities, Slott said on a recent episode of Decoding Retirement (see video above or listen below). They are now “probably the worst possible asset to leave to beneficiaries for wealth transfer, estate planning or even to get your own money out,” he said.

Many American households have an IRA. According to the Investment Company Institute, 41.1 million U.S. households held approximately $15.5 trillion in individual retirement accounts in 2023, with traditional IRAs accounting for the majority of this total.

Slott, who is widely regarded as America’s IRA expert, explained that IRAs were a good idea when they were first created. “You got a tax deduction and the beneficiaries could do what we used to call the stretch IRA,” he said. “So it had some good qualities.”

But IRAs have always been difficult to work with because of the minefield of distribution rules, he continued. “It was like an obstacle course just to get your money out,” Slott said. ‘Your own money. It was ridiculous.”

According to Slott, IRA account owners tolerated the minefield of rules because the benefits on the back end were great. “But now those benefits are gone,” Slott said.

IRAs were once attractive primarily because of the “stretch IRA” benefit that allowed the beneficiary of an inherited IRA to stretch required withdrawals over 30, 40, or even 50 years, potentially spreading tax payments and deferring the bill . a longer period.

However, recent changes in law, most notably the SECURE Act, have eliminated the IRA’s stretch withdrawal strategy and replaced it with a ten-year rule that now requires most beneficiaries to withdraw the entire account balance within ten years, potentially causing significant tax consequences.

Read more: 3 ways retirees can save on taxes

According to Slott, that ten-year rule is a tax trap waiting to happen. If many Americans are forced to take required minimum distributions (RMDs), they may have to pay higher taxes on those withdrawals than they expected.

You may also like

logo

Stay informed with our comprehensive general news site, covering breaking news, politics, entertainment, technology, and more. Get timely updates, in-depth analysis, and insightful articles to keep you engaged and knowledgeable about the world’s latest events.

Subscribe

Subscribe my Newsletter for new blog posts, tips & new photos. Let's stay updated!

© 2024 – All Right Reserved.