Democratic U.S. Rep. Yadira Caraveo and her Republican challenger, state Rep. Gabe Evans, discussed immigration, abortion and Donald Trump Tuesday night during the first debate for one of the nation’s most contentious congressional races.
The debate, hosted by 9Newswas the first of two scheduled ahead of their November race to represent the northern suburbs of the 8th Congressional District. Many of the questions focused on immigration, a topic that both Evans and Caraveo have embraced, although the 30-minute debate included quick topic changes covering abortion, housing, corporal punishment for children and a series of anti-immigrant statements. made by Trump, the Aurora-leaning Republican presidential candidate who moderator Kyle Clark linked to the fascist rhetoric of the 1930s and 1940s.
During much of the debate, moderators urged the candidates — and Evans in particular — to answer questions directly. Asked whether he would condemn Trump’s anti-immigrant statements or describe them as racist, Evans, a freshman state lawmaker from Fort Lupton backed by Trump, said he focused on the policy and twice obliquely repeated that he was “racist statements had always condemned. ”
Evans did indicate that he did not support Trump’s desire to deport every undocumented immigrant in the country, though he broadly supported intensified border security efforts and criticized Caraveo and Democratic lawmakers’ handling of immigration issues.
“We must aggressively target the individuals who are in our communities illegally and committing crimes, and those are the people we must deport,” he said.
Evans also declined to answer directly when asked whether it was appropriate to use corporal punishment on children in schools a bill he voted against last year. He said first that “we need to make sure we provide a safe place for learning in our public schools.” When pressed to answer directly, he started talking about his former work as a “part-time school employee.” Clark then stopped him and continued walking.
Caraveo, who this summer joined a small group of Democrats in supporting a Republican resolution condemning Vice President Kamala Harris’ handling of the border, said her disavowal of some of her previous immigration positions — such as defunding the enforcement of immigration law – reflected a shift in the country.
“I think the country has changed, and we have seen a crisis that both parties have created and for which no solutions have been offered,” Caraveo said, in a nod to the bipartisan bona fides she has worked to reinforce in a district she won with fewer votes. than 1,700 votes two years ago.
Caraveo said she would vote to represent her constituents, which apparently meant a more enforcement-intensive approach. She would not say whether she still supports giving government contracts to companies that employ undocumented workers. She says only that her voters want a “balanced” approach.
She said she would have supported the bipartisan border bill that Trump scuttled earlier this year and accused Republicans of not taking immigration seriously.
“Donald Trump has decided that he would rather deal with the immigration issue than give me the opportunity to vote on it,” she said.
Evans criticized Caraveo’s support for one State law 2019 which, among other things, prohibits local law enforcement from providing a person’s immigration status to federal authorities. (Asked twice if she supported that policy, Caraveo said it “shouldn’t be up to local law enforcement to do what the federal government hasn’t done.”)
In addition to immigration, Caraveo also praised her work at the state level limit the late fees charged to tenantsand Evans bolstered his own bipartisan credentials by noting that he had passed the majority of his bills during his time in the Legislature, despite serving in a chamber that Democrats control with a supermajority.
On abortion, Evans said he did not support a national ban on access to abortion, but did support exemptions when the mother’s life is in danger or in cases of rape or incest. Caraveo said she was in favor of putting Roe vs. Wade, the now-disputed Supreme Court case that provided access to abortion at the grassroots level in America for decades.
Stay up to date on Colorado Politics by signing up for our weekly newsletter, The Spot.
Originally published: